Image source: Unsplash
Zero-fare: Washington, DC, residents can look forward to some encouraging news as the state intends to eliminate bus fares.
According to the city’s decision, Washington will be allowed to join a handful of US cities aiming to disable fares from their metro bus and rail systems.
Numerous cities are now trying the zero-fare scheme, including Boston, San Francisco, and Denver.
Kansas City, Missouri, was the first major city to implement the fare-free public transit system in 2019.
The movement
The zero-fare movement demands that fares on buses, railways, and other shared transportation options be eliminated.
The concept is based on the idea that expanding access to public transportation to everyone, regardless of resources, will increase ridership, reduce traffic congestion, and advance social and economic equality.
The following justifications have led business associations, environmentalists, and Democratic politicians to date to support the zero-fare campaign:
- Less climate change occurs.
- Taking the bus or train can boost regional economies.
- Every day, people require public transportation.
During the pandemic, the campaign gained increased attention as it illustrated the importance of public transit for key professionals responding on-site.
The bill
The zero-fare movement has encountered political opposition even if it is growing in popularity in locations where it contradicts local budgets or legislation.
The zero-fare bill was introduced two weeks prior to the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020.
Charles Allen, a councilman for Washington, DC, was the bill’s sponsor and underlined its importance.
“I don’t charge you when you need the fire department, but yet, we’re going to make sure there’s a fire department when you need,” said Allen.
“That’s how you need to think about this.”
The $2 bus fare is planned to be abolished by the DC plan as early as July.
The bill was overwhelmingly accepted by the city council, and it is now up to Mayor Muriel Bowser to sign it, veto it, or do nothing.
Bowser voiced his objection to the zero-fare concept for Maryland and Virginia without state funding.
However, a mayoral veto may be overridden with unanimous consent.
What it could bring
The zero-fare bill would invest $43 million annually to make using the DC Metrobus free for commuters in addition to providing a dozen 24-hour bus service lines.
Additional taxes would fund it.
The $10 million subsidy program, which would provide city residents a $100 monthly credit to spend on the DC Metrorail, is still being considered by the DC council.
Read also: Tesla makes decisive move to cut prices in US and UK
How to make it happen
Two essential factors that help US municipalities implement the zero-fare system are funding and political support, both of which Kansas has.
Richard Jarrold of the Kansas City Area Transportation Authority says that bus operating expenses are 12% ($8 million) funded by fares.
Morgan Said, the chief of staff to the mayor, claims that Kansas spends $2 to $3 million annually on fare collection.
Less than 10% of the district’s transportation costs are made up of DC fares.
In Richmond, Virginia, fare-free buses have been running since the onset of the pandemic, and fare revenue made up 8% of the agency’s overall budget.
“For some smaller transit agencies that don’t really collect much cash anyway,” said Grant Sparks, a director at the Virginia Department of Rail and Transportation.
“They’re almost spending more to collect the fare than they’re actually receiving in revenue.”
They strengthened the economic argument’s force.
Charles Allen wants to move forward and expand a system of public transit without fares.
Drawbacks
Although the zero-fare proposal is gaining popularity, it still stands out as the exception rather than the rule.
Officials in New York lowered the price of subway tickets to $2.75 for each ride.
In order to offer eligible low-income residents transportation discounts, the city started the Fair Fares program in January 2020.
Subsidizing the city’s transportation system is difficult because it depends on fees for approximately 30% of its operating budget.
An MTA spokeswoman named Meghan Keegan said:
“Until a new plan emerges for funding public transportation in New York that would allow the MTA to be less reliant on fare revenue, there is no way to consider eliminating a vital revenue stream.”
In states that have had success with zero-fare transport, like Virginia, the concept is being expanded to a statewide level.
The amount the state of Virginia should pay to WMATA, the bus operator that runs in Virginia, Maryland, and Washington, DC, is restricted by Virginia law.
Denver also plans to maintain its fares despite its occasional fare holidays.
Debate
Republicans are less enthused about the zero-fare system.
A budget proposal to make public transit fare-free for a year was rejected in Utah, a Republican-dominated state.
Mike Schultz, the majority leader of the Republican-controlled House, said that the system receives sufficient subsidies but pointed out that nothing is free.
The premise of zero-fare was also contested by the New York City nonprofit Transit Center.
According to the organization, a survey indicates that customers would like more frequent and reliable transit.
The debate emphasizes how improbable it is that a federal zero-fare policy will soon be put into effect.
Reference:
The zero-fare public transit movement is picking up momentum
Opinions expressed by US Insider contributors are their own.
