Photo Credit: Luis Alvarez | Getty Images
Many firms may encounter difficulties in attracting personnel to the conventional face-to-face setting. Companies that implement hybrid work conditions have declared that they want to urge their staff to appear in workplaces multiple times each week physically. However, CEOs are experiencing trouble putting it into action. This is due in part to workers’ unwillingness to entirely return to the pre-pandemic setting.
However, as the months pass and the need to revert to the previous system becomes clear, businesses may need to become more insistent.
According to Gartner, a business research organization, at least 69% of US enterprises use remote working arrangements. Of this figure, 26% indicated they want their personnel to be present three days a week, 17% expect them to be present two days a week, and 4% want them to be present once a week. Only 5% of employers demand their employees be in the office five days a week.
Thirty-one percent of the executives polled indicated they do not have a defined frequency for their workers’ on-site attendance. JLL, for example, said that it would not impose a mandated amount of days on its staff this fall.
“We’ve always believed in flexibility to draw the talent we need. We believe fundamentally that the office is a key part of the work ecosystem,” said Laura Adams, JLL’s human resource officer.
The problem befalling executives
Others believe that office occupancy will rise over time, particularly after Labor Day. According to Mark Ein, head of the management business Kastle System, current office occupancy has increased compared to prior 2022. Even with this, the proportion is just 43% of what it was prior to the pandemic.
Ein is certain that the figure will soon rise, given organizations’ desire to restore their systems to their previous state. Covid has become more controllable in several US states, and firm officials are optimistic about getting back on track.
“Short of another surge – in which the scientific community says it’s unsafe to come to work – CEOs are saying it’s no longer an issue of safety, and kids are in school,” stated Johnny Taylor, Society for Human Resource and Management president and CEO.
“They’ve accepted that we’re not going back to the good old days, but [feel] employees don’t want to give anything.”
Others argue that if employees continue to be hesitant, companies may decide to let rid of other employees and recruit others who are prepared to present in the workplace as requested. If this trend continues, businesses will gain even more advantages.
Gallup’s director of research and strategy for workplace management, Ben Wigert, explained, “The game changer would be if widespread layoffs begin taking place. At that point, employees might voluntarily begin spending more time in the office to protect their jobs.”
However, according to Gartner’s chief of research, Brian Kropp, enterprises do not simply fire personnel for noncompliance. According to a poll, just 3% of companies will terminate employees who do not meet the in-office criterion they want to implement.
Kropp added, “If you’re not meeting the attendance [requirement], you get in trouble, but you don’t get fired. They will try to make it work … because the labor market is still so competitive. So they’re not willing to make their hiring problem even worse.”
Negative impact on companies
Threats of wage reduction and termination for non-compliant employees, according to workplace experts, may not be a suitable option. Face time in the office is required. However, research shows that the amount of time spent in the office is not directly associated with the development of positive connections between employers and workers.
“The tide has not shifted entirely yet. It’s still a good job market. Employees have options. And even if the tide turns, don’t disenfranchise them through fear and distrust,” added Wigert.
Opinions expressed by US Insider contributors are their own.